Greed :: essays research papers

For to a greater extent than fifteen years psychologist Julian Edney has visited college campuses across the province to study the effects of greed in a society where oer $100 billion in new wealth accumulates each year. On each of his stays, he would play a game with randomly selected students where 10 metal nuts in a bowl represented supernumerary credit. The students would then take the nuts for a single free credit point. In this, he promised to double the amount of nuts left over(p) in the bowl every 10 seconds. Hypothetically, the game could last constantly yielding limitless rewards as the students took turns taking a nut from the bowl. nonetheless Dr. Edney determined that 65 percent of the groups couldnt get pass the frontmost 10 second round, and the others could only make it a few much cycles until modest students turned into rambunctious maniacs scrounging for that last nut. Edneys conclusion esurience trumps trust. (U.S. News Magazine, 6/17/96 Special) Small tow ns and neighborhoods in the States used to be cohesive, political scientist Bruce Frohnen pronounced in the May 1999 surface of Family Policy. They did not seek openness to all ways of life history. Nor did they seek economic betterment as the sole proper goal, he added. Faith and custom were ruling forces in the lives of Americans, bidding them care for their families and neighbors and their souls, as much as their pocketbooks. But as the material girls and boys grew, so did the need for greed. In a recent study by Roper Starch Worldwide, the values of teenagers lamentable into the new millennium have drastically changed from their parents visions. The division who said they wanted to earn a lot of money grew 25 points from the 38 percent in 1975. Those who said they needed a vaporize oven as a necessity rose 19 points, and the percentage that believed life without an answering machine was incomprehensible grew more than 18 points. At the equivalent time, teenagers who belie ved developing a meaningful philosophy of life dropped by 42 percent. However the rise of moneys power in student-age adults coincided with a reward system for the newly transpired talents. Repetitive tasks are being replaced by super technology while responsibilities requiring intelligence and skill are more emphasized. It is a winner take all society though, where the lopsided contribution of benefits go to very few players. The ostentation is not all approaching from the upcoming generation though.